{"id":24576,"date":"2018-06-18T12:06:12","date_gmt":"2018-06-18T16:06:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/?p=24576"},"modified":"2022-03-16T10:56:16","modified_gmt":"2022-03-16T14:56:16","slug":"email-users-subject-to-phishing-attacks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/email-users-subject-to-phishing-attacks\/","title":{"rendered":"Email Users Subject to Phishing Attacks, Study Finds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As cyberattacks are growing ever more sophisticated, the need to develop ways to identify and thwart such attacks are becoming increasingly necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/vtnews.vt.edu\/articles\/2018\/06\/phishingattacks.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">new study<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> from Virginia Tech determined exactly how capable email providers are at combating phishing attacks, a type of scam in which cyberthieves attempt to steal personal information or install malicious software via email.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>The threat of phishing<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Phishing attacks have existed since the inception of email. Typically, they involve using a disguised email to trick victims into providing sensitive information, such as credit card information or important identity information.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Phishing attacks are one of the most common email scams, accounting for nearly half of the more than 2,000 security breaches reported by Verizon in the last two years. This includes attacks on individuals, generally extracting personal financial information, as well as attacks on businesses, which can lead to major data breaches within the company.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These attacks, whether targeting individuals or corporations, can be very costly, accounting for the leakage of billions of records and costing millions of dollars.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Phishing attacks have gradually become more sophisticated. Email hackers have developed ways to copy trusted addresses, such as friends, co-workers, or familiar businesses, and send forged emails. This kind of hacking is referred to as \u201cspoofing,\u201d and can be one of the most dangerous kinds of attacks.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Spoofing attacks are particularly dangerous because the current email system has no built-in mechanism to prevent it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe SMTP system we are using today was designed without security in mind,\u201d <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/people.cs.vt.edu\/gangwang\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Gang Wang<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, an assistant professor of computer science in Virginia Tech\u2019s <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/eng.vt.edu\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">College of Engineering<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, said in a statement. \u201cThat\u2019s something that has plagued the system since its inception.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There have been attempts to create a more secure email system using SMTP extensions, including SPF (sender policy framework), DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail), and DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication). These all function to help authenticate the sender, thereby helping users identify threatening messages.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While a number of email providers have taken steps to make their domains more secure for users, an analysis by the Virginia Tech researchers concluded that, of the top 1 million domains, only 45 percent have SPF and 5 percent have DMARC, suggesting that email providers could go a long way to ensure the protection of their users.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>The study<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Wang, along with <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/people.cs.vt.edu\/hanghu\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hang Hu<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, a doctoral student at Virginia Tech, sought to find out exactly how vulnerable email users were across different providers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To do so, they staged end-to-end spoofing experiments on popular email providers. This involved creating user accounts on 35 providers, including Gmail, iCloud, and Outlook. These accounts modeled the receiver, or the victim, in their experiments. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They then used an experimental server to send forged emails with fake sender addresses to these accounts. In theory, if the spoofed domain has a valid SPF, DKIM or DMARC record, then the receiver is able to detect spoofing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Because email content can affect how spam filters handle the email, the researchers embedded the email with five different types of email content: a blank email, a blank email with a benign URL, a blank email with a benign attachment, a benign email with actual content, and a phishing email with content that impersonates technical support that directs the user to a URL. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In doing so, the researchers sought to minimize the impact that spam filtering had on their results.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Through performing these experiments,the researchers found that email providers did not provide very effective safeguards against spoofed emails.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cOur experiment results show that forged emails have a good chance to bypass email providers and arrive in the user inbox,\u201d said Wang. \u201cFor example, out of the 35 email services we tested, 34 of them would deliver at least one forged email to the user inbox (including popular email services such as Gmail, Yahoo Mail, iCloud). If we spoof an \u2018existing contact\u2019 of the email receiver, then all 35 email services can be penetrated.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The results also showed that 30 services allowed at least one phishing email to get into the inbox.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In many cases, emails that failed authentication were still delivered to the users. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This occurred even on email providers with more extensive security protocols such as Gmail and iCloud. Furthermore, only six email services &#8212; Gmail, Protonmail, Naver, Mail.ru, 163.com, and 126.com &#8212; displayed a security warning on forged emails.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To test the effectiveness of security cues, the researchers also conducted two user studies with real participants. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the first study, participants took part in a role-playing experiment where they were presented with a spoofed email and asked how they would respond to this email. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the second study, the participants were sent phishing emails over their actual email address. For the next 20 days, the researchers monitored the user\u2019s response.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The researchers found that users who received the email with a security indicator clicked through the email at a 17.9 percent rate. Without a security cue, the click-through rate was 26.1 percent.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Among those who opened the email, the click-through rate rose to 37.2 percent for those who received a cue and 48.9 percent for those who did not.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Takeaways<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Wang suggested that the study\u2019s results demonstrate that email providers have a long way to go to provide full security for their users.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe reason is that not all the internet hosts have adopted SPF, DKIM or DMARC,\u201d he said. \u201cIf the email provider cannot verify the sender of an email, unless the email has a clear malicious signal, the email provider tends to prioritize email delivery. As a result, forged emails have a chance to get into the inbox.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">He added that in order to provide the best protection for users, email providers should adopt these protective SMTP extensions and mark emails with unverified server addresses with security indicators. He also said they should also improve mobile email apps so as to allow users to access security information for emails.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For users, Wang has two pieces of advice. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First, \u201cBe skeptical, particularly, do not trust the sender address of the emails.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Second, \u201cFor important emails (e.g., sharing important information, making big payments), use additional channels to confirm with the sender (e.g., making a phone call).\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moving forward, Wang intends to learn how to design effective security indicators to inform users of unverified emails. He also intends to explore using machine to provide users with targeted security advice based on the specific email context.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As cyberattacks are growing ever more sophisticated, the need to develop ways to identify and thwart such attacks are becoming increasingly necessary. A new study from Virginia Tech determined exactly how capable email providers are at combating phishing attacks, a type of scam in which cyberthieves attempt to steal personal information or install malicious software [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":24568,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[230,229,572],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-lead-stories","category-virginia-polytechnic-institute-and-state-university"],"aioseo_notices":[],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/email-phishing.jpeg",830,533,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/email-phishing-224x144.jpeg",224,144,true],"medium":["https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/email-phishing-300x193.jpeg",300,193,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/email-phishing.jpeg",830,533,false],"large":["https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/email-phishing.jpeg",830,533,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/email-phishing.jpeg",830,533,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/email-phishing.jpeg",830,533,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Sam Benezra","author_link":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/author\/sam-benezra\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"As cyberattacks are growing ever more sophisticated, the need to develop ways to identify and thwart such attacks are becoming increasingly necessary. A new study from Virginia Tech determined exactly how capable email providers are at combating phishing attacks, a type of scam in which cyberthieves attempt to steal personal information or install malicious software&hellip;","featured_media_src_url":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/email-phishing.jpeg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24576\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tun.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}